Briev
Live
Politics

DHS seeks access to Maine protesters' private Signal chats, raising First Amendment concerns

The Department of Homeland Security is requesting court-ordered disclosure of neighborhood Signal group chats used by Maine protesters, prompting a First Amendment challenge in the Hilton v. Noem lawsuit.

Federal litigation in Hilton v. Noem sees the Department of Homeland Security seeking discovery of private Signal group chats that Maine residents created to track Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities. Protesters contend the request violates the First Amendment, and their counsel, Genevieve Nadeau of Protect Democracy, says the government also wants lists of protests attended and any comments reflecting opinions on law-enforcement tactics.

The plaintiffs have turned over some chats with personal data redacted, while the government has deposed participants about chat membership and possible involvement of officials. FIRE senior attorney Adam Steinbaugh called the demand an unlawful intrusion on collective action. DHS and the Justice Department declined to comment. The case highlights ongoing tensions over surveillance of dissent and digital privacy.

Why it matters

It tests how far the government can go in probing private digital communications of activists.

In this story

first amendmentsignal group chatsdhs surveillanceprotesters lawsuitcivil libertiescollective actiondigital privacy