DOJ memo challenges federal disability rights, sparking fears of service cuts
The Justice Department issued a memo saying federal disability laws do not obligate states to provide home-based services, prompting concerns that Medicaid aid for people with disabilities could be reduced.
In June, the Justice Department released a memorandum asserting that federal disability statutes do not compel states to provide services that keep disabled individuals in their homes, overturning the Supreme Court’s 1999 Olmstead decision. The reinterpretation threatens Medicaid-funded home aides and other supports relied upon by roughly 40 million adults and 5 million children with disabilities, as illustrated by Virginia resident Amanda DeSimone-Shabrack’s reduced aide hours.
Republican-controlled states such as Texas, Alaska and Florida are invoking the memo in ongoing federal lawsuits to challenge integration mandates, while Senate Democrats, led by Tammy Duckworth, have introduced a resolution urging the DOJ to rescind the opinion. The Department of Health and Human Services reiterated its dedication to enforcing civil-rights protections, yet advocacy groups caution that the memo could pave the way for rescinding existing guidance and increasing institutional placements. The debate unfolds amid broader budget cuts to Medicaid and a recent executive order expanding involuntary treatment, raising alarms about a potential rollback of decades of disability rights progress.
Why it matters
The memo could reshape how millions of disabled Americans receive care, affecting their independence and federal funding.
In this story