Federal staff face chaotic forced relocations amid costly leases and poor planning

Multiple federal agencies are moving employees to new offices this summer, but the process has been disorganized, expensive and has caused workplace disruptions.

Since last year, the federal government has been ordering staff from at least six agencies to vacate existing offices and report to new locations, a policy begun by the Trump administration to cut costs and decentralize operations. Despite the intent to save money, agencies like NASA and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are still paying over $2.5 million and $4 million annually for empty spaces whose leases run into the 2030s. Employees report severe logistical problems, including bedbug infestations, spotty Wi-Fi, and a shortage of workstations, which have hampered productivity.

Unions and members of Congress argue the relocations breach laws requiring congressional consent for such real-estate decisions, and lawsuits have been filed against several agencies. The timing of moves, such as the Forest Service’s shift during an active wildfire season, has drawn particular criticism. The turmoil has led to heightened anxiety among workers and a number of resignations, raising concerns about the federal workforce’s stability.