Briev
Live
Crime & Justice

Illinois Appellate Court Sanctions Attorney Mason Cole $15,000 for AI-Generated False Citations

The Illinois Appellate Court fined attorney Mason Cole $15,000 after his briefs contained numerous fabricated statutory quotes and nonexistent case citations, many produced via AI.

The Illinois Appellate Court, hearing Scott v. Ill. Hum. Rts.

Comm'n, chastised attorney Mason Cole for repeatedly submitting briefs that misquoted statutes, cited nonexistent cases, and misapplied existing case law. Cole claimed reliance on a premium corporate ChatGPT subscription and cross-checking with Lexis-Nexis, yet several references—such as a fabricated “Harris” case and outdated statutory subsections—were wholly inaccurate. After a June 30 order demanding a corrective response, Cole admitted the citations were false, though his reply still contained errors, including a non-existent subsection and misquoted language. The court fined him $15,000, calculating $1,500 for each of the ten false citations, and sent the opinion to the Illinois Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission, emphasizing that AI-generated hallucinations do not excuse attorney responsibility.

Why it matters

The case underscores that lawyers must verify AI-produced citations, as courts will levy heavy penalties for false legal references.

In this story

attorney sanctionsAI hallucinationfalse citationsIllinois appellate courtlegal ethicsChatGPTLexis-Nexisstatutory misquotationprofessional conduct