Professors and AAUP sue Texas A&M System over race and gender teaching ban
Four faculty members and the AAUP have filed a federal lawsuit seeking to halt the Texas A&M System's rule limiting instruction on race, gender and sexuality and to restore courses that were cancelled under the policy.
A coalition of four professors and the American Association of University Professors petitioned a federal judge in Houston to block the Texas A&M University System’s newly adopted restrictions on teaching race, gender and sexuality, and to reinstate courses that were dropped under the rule. The regulation forbids "advocating" race or gender ideology, defines those terms narrowly, and mandates presidential approval for any related content, effectively barring such material from core curricula.
The suit claims the policy violates the faculty’s First Amendment protections and is so ambiguous that instructors cannot know what is permissible without risking sanctions. Plaintiffs—Leonard Bright, Vanita Reddy, Landon Sadler of Texas A&M and Aaron George of Tarleton State—are represented by the ACLU of Texas, the national ACLU and Yetter Coleman, and they seek a declaration that the rule is unconstitutional and an order to restore classes like an LGBTQ literature course and to allow previously removed readings.
The policy was enacted after a student’s secret recording of a gender-identity lesson went viral, prompting a Republican lawmaker’s social-media outcry, the firing and subsequent resignation of then-president Mark A. Welsh III, and a system-wide review ordered by Chancellor Glenn Hegar. Texas A&M officials contend only six of more than 5,400 reviewed courses were cancelled, but the lawsuit argues the impact is broader.
Why it matters
The case could set a precedent for academic freedom and how universities address race and gender topics across the country.
How the sides frame it
LOW AGREEMENTLeft-leaning coverage frames the lawsuit as a fight against vague restrictions on teaching race, gender and sexuality that infringe faculty First Amendment rights, while centrist coverage frames it as a censorship battle over pro-LGBTQ+ material tied to a right-wing backlash.
LEFT
The suit challenges the system’s narrow ban on “advocating” race, gender or sexuality ideology as an unconstitutional, ambiguous restriction on academic freedom.
CENTER
The lawsuit is presented as a First Amendment claim against censorship of pro-LGBTQ+ content, noting the policy was adopted after a wave of right-wing backlash.
The left emphasises
- block the Texas A&M System’s restrictions on teaching race, gender and sexuality
- policy violates faculty’s First Amendment protections
- regulation is so ambiguous professors cannot know what is permissible
In this story