Senate split over keeping or scrapping the filibuster intensifies
Republican senators are publicly debating whether to preserve the filibuster or eliminate it, with arguments appearing in recent op-eds.
The question of the filibuster’s fate remains unsettled in the Senate, despite Majority Leader John Thune’s claim that no vote is viable. Utah Senator John Curtis wrote in one outlet that the practice safeguards minority voices and bipartisan engagement, a view echoed by some across the aisle. In contrast, Republican Rick Scott, also in one outlet, argued that the filibuster’s current form stifles negotiation and results.
Senator Mike Lee has championed a “talking filibuster” to force debate on stalled bills such as the SAVE America Act. Democrats have historically struggled with the rule, with figures like Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin blocking past reforms, while progressive candidates such as Abdul El-Sayed call for abolition. The debate is expected to persist without imminent legislative change.
Why it matters
The filibuster determines how easily Congress can pass laws, affecting the balance of power between parties.
In this story