Supreme Court questions exclusion of CJI from election commissioner selection panel
The Supreme Court asked why Parliament omitted the chief justice from the committee that appoints the chief election commissioner and election commissioners, stressing the need for both actual and perceived independence.
In New Delhi, a two-judge Supreme Court bench raised concerns over Parliament’s decision to leave the chief justice out of the panel that chooses the chief election commissioner and election commissioners, noting that the CJI participates in other high-profile appointment committees. The judges reserved a ruling on the government’s request to refer the matter to a constitution bench while examining challenges to the 2023 Act, which delegates appointment power to a committee comprising the prime minister, the opposition leader and a cabinet minister.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that the prime minister’s decisions should be trusted and that the three branches of government must respect each other’s independence. The court also asked how many ministers have pending criminal cases, recalling earlier trust placed in the elected government to avoid such appointments. Attorney General R Venkataramani and the government defended the legislation, claiming it does not jeopardise the Election Commission’s autonomy. Senior lawyers D Seshadri Naidu, Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Prashant Bhushan and Sanjay Parikh opposed the government's late plea for a larger bench.
Why it matters
The ruling could reshape how India ensures impartiality in appointing officials who oversee free and fair elections.
In this story