Briev
Live
Politics

X complies with Turkish court order to block Imamoglu's candidacy account while appealing

X has restricted access to Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu's presidential candidacy account in Turkey following a court order, and is now challenging the ruling in court.

Following a judicial directive from an Istanbul court, X has blocked the Turkish audience from viewing the account that Ekrem Imamoglu, the incarcerated mayor of Istanbul, uses for his presidential bid, with authorities invoking national security and public order concerns. The platform acknowledges a legal duty under Turkish law to apply the order but has simultaneously launched a court challenge, arguing the measure is unwarranted.

Imamoglu, arrested on March 19, 2025, sparked the country's largest protests in over a decade and remains behind bars awaiting trial on accusations ranging from graft to espionage, all of which he refutes. He was chosen as the Republican People's Party's presidential nominee after an internal vote, even though Istanbul University annulled his degree—a prerequisite for candidacy—just before his detention. X previously faced a similar block on Imamoglu's main account in May 2025 and also contested that restriction. The episode highlights the tension between local legal mandates and the platform's stated commitment to free expression under owner Elon Musk.

Why it matters

The case pits Turkish legal authority against a global tech platform's free-speech stance, affecting a major opposition figure's campaign.

How the sides frame it

MODERATE AGREEMENT

Both camps report X’s compliance with the Turkish court order and its legal challenge, but right-leaning coverage adds extensive background on Imamoglu’s arrest, protests and the accusations against him.

CENTER

Centrist coverage presents the story as a straightforward report of X complying with the court order, emphasizing its challenge to the order and claim of transparency.

RIGHT

Right-leaning coverage frames the story by stressing X’s legal duty and its challenge as unwarranted, while foregrounding Imamoglu’s arrest, protests and contested accusations.

The right emphasises

  • legal duty under Turkish law
  • court challenge arguing the measure is unwarranted
  • Imamoglu’s arrest, protests and accusations he refutes

Possibly left out

  • Centrist coverage reports no background on Imamoglu's arrest and protests, absent from right-leaning coverage.

In this story

court orderaccount blockpresidential candidacyfree speechlegal challengeTurkey protests