Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Business

AI hiring tools spark calls for transparency and human review rights

A UK survey shows most job seekers are unaware they can contest automated rejections, prompting a campaign for audit and human oversight of AI recruitment tools.

A recent Censuswide poll of 2,000 UK workers who applied for jobs in the last 24 months revealed that three-quarters were unaware of their right to request a human review of an automated rejection. Sheeraz Gulsher, CEO of People Like Us, is spearheading the "Reject the Rejections" campaign, calling on employers to audit AI recruitment systems, publish findings and allow independent assessment. The research also showed that 70 % of ethnically diverse applicants conceal information such as country of origin or religion on their CVs, compared with 57 % of white candidates, due to fears of algorithmic bias.

While only about 90 of 425 recruiters surveyed said they use AI for CV screening, many candidates tailor applications for perceived bots, leading to homogenised, AI-polished resumes. Ongoing legal claims against Workday and guidance from the ICO and the Information Commissioner’s Office stress the importance of transparency and human oversight. Advocates argue that informing applicants of their right to a human review could improve feedback, trust and fairness in hiring.

Why it matters

Job seekers need to know they can challenge AI rejections to ensure fair, transparent hiring.

In this story

AI recruitmentautomated rejectionhuman reviewbiaslegal righttransparencyauditcandidate concealmentalgorithmic bias
Get the beta ↗