Andhra Pradesh High Court orders DRDO to reassess unusually low defence bids
The Andhra Pradesh High Court told the Defence Research and Development Organisation to review abnormally low offers before finalising contracts.
Jaykay Enterprises contested DRDO's decision to grant a development contract for a next-generation processor-based moored mine to Apollo Micro Systems, alleging the winning bid was far below material costs. The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that DRDO failed to perform the required pre-award examination for such a low quote and mandated a review of the lowest and second-lowest bids according to Clause 6.42(b)(ii) of the 2025 procurement manual.
The court emphasized that a low price alone does not invalidate a tender, but a viability assessment is essential. Should the bidders satisfy the prescribed checks, one outlet award and financial approval may remain; if not, the authorities must proceed under the standard procurement framework. The decision underscores the need for rigorous scrutiny of defence procurement under the Development-cum-Production Partnership model.
Why it matters
It ensures defence contracts are awarded only after confirming a bidder can deliver, protecting public funds and project integrity.
In this story
