Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Technology

Anna Delvey pushes back against Wikipedia’s labeling and anonymous editing rules

Anna Delvey has launched a Substack series demanding changes to her Wikipedia entry, arguing that the site’s anonymous editors and persistent “con artist” label misrepresent her current life.

In a four-part Substack series, Anna Delvey argues that her Wikipedia biography remains dominated by references to her grand-larceny conviction and the “con artist” label, even though she now focuses on artistic and entrepreneurial projects. She says the site’s sourcing rules favor older scandal coverage, making it hard to update the entry, and notes that Google’s search results still display the disputed label. Scholars such as Benjamin Mako Hill and Aaron Mackey explain that anonymous editing is protected speech and essential for a diverse, democratic knowledge base, but also acknowledge that it can prevent subjects from directly influencing their pages.

The discussion expands to Wikipedia’s influence on AI training data, with researchers highlighting the platform’s status as a trusted source for large language models. While Delvey has engaged with some editors and considered attending a community picnic, she maintains that the current system lets past sensationalism define her online identity.

Why it matters

The story highlights tensions between personal reputation, free-speech protections, and the influence of crowd-sourced platforms on public perception.

In this story

Anna DelveyWikipedia anonymityFirst Amendmentonline reputationAI training datalabel controversycitation policycrowdsourced editing
Get the beta ↗