Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Arizona voters turn against Flock surveillance cameras despite seeing police benefits

A recent poll shows a majority of Arizonans oppose the deployment of Flock license-plate-reader cameras, even though about half think they aid law enforcement.

A statewide poll in Arizona indicates growing resistance to the proliferation of Flock’s automated license-plate-reading cameras, with 63% of respondents opposing their use by local police. Despite this, 51% still view the technology as a useful tool for law-enforcement operations. The same survey shows that 82% of voters worry the cameras could be misused and equally support the idea of independent audits of surveillance providers.

Partisan differences are evident: 73% of Democratic voters oppose the cameras compared with 54% of Republicans, and Democrats are more likely to reject sharing the data with ICE. The backlash follows revelations that Customs and Border Protection has accessed at least 1,600 Flock readers across 22 states and that companies like SignalTrace can augment the devices to track additional electronic signals from vehicles. The data underscores a tension between perceived security benefits and privacy concerns among Arizona residents.

Why it matters

The poll highlights a widening public divide over surveillance technology and its impact on privacy and law-enforcement practices.

In this story

ArizonaFlock cameraslicense plate readerssurveillancepublic pollmisuse concernsICE sharingSignalTrace
Get the beta ↗