Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Australia's steep tobacco taxes spark debate over illicit market and public-health gains

Rising cigarette excise has driven most smokers to cheap illegal products, prompting politicians to argue for drastic tax cuts while health officials warn of reversing decades of progress.

In 2026 more than half of Australia’s tobacco consumption comes from illegal sources, a sharp rise from about 10 % a decade ago, as legal packs cost $40-$50 compared with $15-$20 on the black market. Retailers like Mat Evans report dwindling sales and revenue loss, while the federal budget loses billions in excise revenue. The Coalition and One Nation now propose excise cuts of up to 80 % to bring legal prices near illicit levels, a move opposed by Labor’s Mark Butler and public-health scholars who link high taxes to falling smoking rates.

Criminologists compare the situation to Prohibition-era crime and argue that only a substantial tax reduction could curb smuggling, but health academics warn such cuts would likely boost smoking prevalence. Enforcement agencies stress that even massive border seizures may not deter organized groups given their huge profit margins. The debate centers on whether price policy or tougher policing will more effectively eliminate the illicit market without undoing public-health gains.

Why it matters

The outcome will shape Australia’s public-health success and its fight against organized crime.

In this story

tobacco exciseillicit marketsmoking ratesorganized crimetax cut proposalpublic healthborder seizuresprice policy
Get the beta ↗