Authors argue that renewed religious engagement could curb U.S. political polarization
In their new book, Matthew Kaemingk and Shadi Hamid claim that declining religiosity fuels polarization and that liberals should re-engage with faith communities to protect democracy.
Matthew Kaemingk and Shadi Hamid’s book, *Can Religion Save Democracy?*, argues that the erosion of organized religion has deepened U.S. political polarization, undermining democratic norms. They propose that liberals, especially non-believers, should engage with religious institutions, adopt practices such as prayer-like reflection, and learn from faith-based approaches to debate and forgiveness. The authors point to the rise of religious Democrats, including Texas Senate nominee James Talarico and Kansas Senate nominee Rev. Adam Hamilton, as evidence of a broader trend.
They also cite recent comments from Pope Leo XIV, who urged secular leaders to view religion as an educational resource rather than a threat. While acknowledging that religious participation has not always curbed extremism, they maintain that a collaborative effort between religious and secular Americans is essential for preserving pluralistic democracy.
Why it matters
The proposal highlights how bridging religious and secular divides could reduce polarization and strengthen democratic institutions.
In this story
