Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Barrister's claim that some women lie sparks national backlash and calls for legal education reform

Melbourne barrister Geoffrey Steward suggested that false sexual assault allegations occur, prompting a coalition of survivors and safety leaders to demand a review of legal education and protections.

Geoffrey Steward, a barrister in Melbourne, sparked controversy by stating that some women make false sexual assault allegations and that recognition should depend on a perpetrator’s confession or conviction. He also proposed that accused individuals not be identified in court unless they plead guilty or are found guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The comments, shared on LinkedIn and endorsed by several senior lawyers, prompted an open letter from over 90 survivors and leaders in the anti-violence sector, who warned the views could perpetuate rape myths and deny services to victims.

The letter called for a review of legal education and highlighted research showing a small percentage of false reports but a large gap in reporting and conviction rates. Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny and federal Attorney-General Michelle Rowland reiterated that victim-survivors deserve to be heard and supported irrespective of court outcomes. Experts cited the high attrition of sexual assault cases in the justice system and stressed that requiring a conviction would exclude the majority of survivors from assistance.

Why it matters

The debate influences how sexual assault victims are treated by the legal system and could affect access to support services.

In this story

false sexual assault allegationsvictim-survivor rightslegal education reviewrape mythscourt naming rulessexual violence reportingjustice system attritionsurvivor-led advocacy
Get the beta ↗