Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics
UNDERREPORTED

Bipartisan bill aims to bar non-compete clauses for workers earning under $100,000

Representatives Anna Paulina Luna and Ro Khanna introduced legislation that would prohibit companies from enforcing non-compete agreements on employees making less than $100,000 annually.

Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna have jointly drafted the Workers’ Right To Compete Act, targeting non-compete agreements for employees earning under $100,000 a year. The measure would void both current and future non-compete clauses within a month of passage, freeing affected workers to seek new jobs. Proponents claim such bans raise wages and encourage economic growth, pointing to KKR & Co.’s internal ban and a Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis study linking Oregon’s non-compete prohibition to a 2-3% wage increase for hourly workers.

Khanna highlighted California’s long-standing ban as a driver of Silicon Valley innovation, referencing founders like Dario Amodei. The bill is portrayed as a bipartisan initiative that could bridge political divides and promote competition in the tech sector. Critics have not been quoted, and the Federal Trade Commission’s earlier attempt to ban non-competes was overturned by a court.

Why it matters

The bill could reshape labor contracts, potentially raising wages and fostering innovation for millions of lower-income workers.

In this story

non-compete agreementsWorkers’ Right To Compete Actwage growthbipartisan legislationemployee freedominnovationsilicon valleylower-income workers
Get the beta ↗