Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

China’s supply-chain worries drove its clean-energy surge, Europe remains unmoved

A new LSE study links China’s shift to wind and solar to a historic fear of oil imports through the Malacca Strait, while Europe still leans on fossil fuels despite similar risks.

Research released by the London School of Economics’ Grantham Research Institute traces China’s clean-energy boom to a strategic response to the “Malacca dilemma,” when most of its oil imports passed through a chokepoint it could not control. This early focus on supply-chain resilience led to sustained investment in wind and solar, a move Xi Jinping described as “forward-looking” after the US-Iran conflict disrupted oil flows.

The authors contend that green growth offers both security and economic durability, dismissing arguments that diversifying fossil-fuel imports improves resilience because oil prices are set globally. Citing Oxford University analysis, the paper finds that extra North Sea drilling would cut UK household energy costs by only £16-£82 a year, far less than the £105-£441 savings projected under a renewable-focused pathway. The study highlights the divergent reactions of China’s centralized system and Europe’s fragmented approach to hypothetical supply shocks.

Why it matters

It shows how energy security concerns can reshape national strategies, influencing global climate and economic outcomes.

In this story

supply-chain resiliencerenewable energywind powersolar poweroil import dependenceMalacca dilemmaenergy securityNorth Sea drillinggreen growth
Get the beta ↗