Clash erupts in NT Parliament over voluntary assisted dying bill amendments
During debate on the Northern Territory's voluntary assisted dying legislation, backbencher Tanzil Rahman criticised Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby and announced plans to amend the bill before a conscience vote on Thursday.
Parliamentary debate over the Northern Territory's voluntary assisted dying (VAD) bill turned contentious on Tuesday, with Country Liberal Party backbencher Dr. Tanzil Rahman accusing his peers of inauthenticity and labeling the government's proposal as overly restrictive. Rahman targeted Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby, who introduced the legislation and defended safeguards such as a 12-month life-expectancy threshold and a clause preventing doctors from initiating VAD conversations.
He announced he will move amendments on Thursday to remove both provisions and to require care facilities to provide VAD information. Deputy Chief Minister Gerard Maley immediately criticised Rahman's language, defending the 12-month rule and dismissing the amendment proposals as misguided. Maley also chastised members who had spoken to the media, insisting the issue should rise above personal publicity.
Opposition leader Selena Uibo plans to table comparable amendments, but it is unclear how many Labor MLAs will back them. The conscience vote scheduled for Thursday is unlikely to adopt the changes, with only a small minority of the 25-seat assembly expressing definite support.
Why it matters
The dispute could shape the final form of the NT's assisted dying law, affecting patient rights and medical practice.
In this story
