Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Constitutional Court rebukes Supreme Court over amnesty law interpretation

Spain's Constitutional Court ruled that the Supreme Court misapplied the Amnesty Law by excluding public-fund misappropriation, overturning a detention order against Carles Puigdemont.

In a recent judgment, Spain's Constitutional Court declared that the Supreme Court's exclusion of the offence of public-fund misappropriation from the Amnesty Law breached the constitutional guarantee of effective judicial protection. The court argued that the Supreme Court's expansive interpretation contradicted the law's spirit, which aims to ease the social and institutional tensions stemming from the Catalan independence movement.

It highlighted that the Supreme Court's reasoning ignored the specific purpose of the misappropriation offence and its link to the separatist process. Acting on the Constitutional Court's guidance, Supreme Court judge Pablo Llarena annulled the national detention order against former Catalan president Carles Puigdemont. The ruling also noted that previous requests for amnesty by Puigdemont and Antoni Comín i Oliveres had been denied, despite the European Union's top court finding no financial impact from the illegal referendum.

Why it matters

The decision reshapes how Spain's amnesty law applies to Catalan separatist cases, affecting high-profile politicians and legal precedent.

In this story

constitutional courtsupreme courtamnesty lawpublic fund misappropriationCatalan independencejudicial protectionlegal interpretation
Get the beta ↗