Debate Over Gender and Merit in Utah Supreme Court Appointments Intensifies
Utah Governor Spencer Cox has three women among twelve candidates for two Supreme Court vacancies, prompting discussion on whether gender should factor into the selection.
Governor Spencer Cox presented a roster of twelve applicants for the two open seats on the Utah Supreme Court, three of whom are women, making a female appointment plausible. During a Federalist Society event, U.S. District Attorney Melissa Holyoak argued that gender should be irrelevant, focusing on qualifications such as intellect, experience, integrity and temperament. Cox reinforced the merit-based approach, stating he does not consider a candidate’s sex when making appointments.
The conversation referenced recent national trends, including President Donald Trump’s anti-DEI actions and President Joe Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman to the U.S. Supreme Court. Attorney Brent Hatch, a former White House counsel, agreed with Holyoak, asserting that DEI should not guide Utah’s high-court selections. The discussion highlights the tension between merit-centric and diversity-focused philosophies in judicial nominations.
Why it matters
The debate shapes how Utah balances merit and diversity in selecting its top judges, reflecting a national conversation on judicial appointments.
In this story
