Debate Over Menachem Begin's Legacy Highlights His Push for Rights and Constitution
A recent commentary argues that labeling former Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin as a fascist is inaccurate, emphasizing his long opposition to emergency laws and advocacy for a formal constitution.
The author challenges recent social-media accusations that former Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin was a fascist, pointing out his lengthy peaceful opposition in the Knesset and his eventual elected tenure followed by a voluntary resignation. Drawing on Maya Mark's study of Israel's early emergency laws, the commentary underscores Begin's persistent objections to legislation that curtailed due process and his push for a written constitution with a comprehensive bill of rights.
It also mentions his campaign to end military rule over Arab citizens in the Galilee, noting the political risk this posed within his right-wing base. The piece contrasts Begin's liberal-leaning Herut party with David Ben-Gurion's Labor Party, which the author says introduced emergency measures, prolonged military governance, and state control of major industries—features the author associates with fascist-type statism. While acknowledging Ben-Gurion's democratic credentials, the article suggests his skepticism of state power was less pronounced than Begin's.
Why it matters
Understanding how historical leaders are characterized influences current debates about democracy and state authority.
In this story
