Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Debate Over Press Restrictions Highlights Historical Patterns of Media Suppression

A reader criticized an article for seeming to endorse presidential bans on news outlets, prompting a broader look at how U.S. presidents have limited press access.

Robyn T. Elliott sent a complaint alleging that the magazine had sided with Donald Trump’s decision to bar one outlet, MS NOW and one outlet from the White House, urging a rebranding if it did not champion press freedom. The magazine responded that it merely described the ban, quoted both opponents and defenders, and let readers evaluate the coverage. The exchange led to a wider examination of presidential attitudes toward the press, citing Obama’s increased Espionage Act cases, secret seizures of one outlet phone records, and similar record-seeking actions under Trump and Biden.

In 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi allowed the Justice Department to pursue journalists’ records again, and subpoenas were briefly issued to major newspapers before being withdrawn. The piece also highlighted the surge in FOIA requests, which expanded the backlog from 115,080 in 2016 to 339,671 in 2025, illustrating systemic challenges beyond any single administration.

Why it matters

It shows how executive actions and legal tools can shape press freedom and public access to information.

In this story

press freedomwhite house banfoia backlogjournalist recordspresidential press restrictions
Get the beta ↗