Domestic backlash against surveillance tech threatens post-9/11 counterterrorism gains
A rising anti-technology movement in the United States is endangering the advanced counterterrorism tools developed since the 2001 attacks.
The article contrasts the pre-9/11 intelligence system, which relied on printed photos and slow investigations, with today’s smartphone-driven data, AI threat detection, and cross-agency platforms that have prevented another major attack. Yet a growing domestic backlash—spurred by anti-police activists and city councils restricting companies like Flock, SoundThinking’s ShotSpotter, and Palantir—threatens to roll back a quarter-century of progress.
Recent actions include New York’s temporary moratorium on new data-center construction and protests against digital surveillance. Experts warn that distrust could hinder responses to emerging threats such as lone-wolf extremists, youth radicalized via social media, and overseas networks like Sweden’s Foxtrot Network and Russia’s “gig-economy” terrorism model. The piece urges greater transparency about how these technologies operate to rebuild public support while preserving necessary safeguards.
Why it matters
Public distrust of surveillance tech could weaken the tools that keep the nation safe from terrorism.
In this story
