Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Election lawyer Macalintal vows Supreme Court challenge to barangay vote delay

Election attorney Romulo Macalintal announced plans to contest the new law that pushes the Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan elections to 2028 before the Supreme Court.

Romulo Macalintal, a noted election lawyer, said he will file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court to overturn Republic Act No. 12326, which delays the Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan elections until the second Monday of November 2028 and lengthens officials' terms from four to five years. He described the measure as a grave abuse of discretion that strips millions of Filipinos of their suffrage rights and was strategically passed just before the September 28 deadline for candidate filings.

The Commission on Elections has already cancelled all election-related activities, and Macalintal claims the rapid transmission of the bill to the Office of the President left no window for judicial relief. He also referenced the 2023 Macalintal v. Comelec decision, arguing that routine disaster response does not constitute a constitutional emergency warranting election postponement. Previously, he submitted a supplemental letter-petition seeking a presidential veto, labeling the law unconstitutional and vague. The challenge highlights tensions between legislative actions and constitutional voting rights in the Philippines.

Why it matters

The case could determine whether the government can lawfully postpone local elections, affecting millions of voters' rights.

How the sides frame it

LOW AGREEMENT

Left-leaning coverage condemns the election delay law as a grave abuse that robs voters of their rights, while centrist coverage presents the Comelec’s view, focusing on procedural challenges and the logistical and financial impact of the postponement.

LEFT

Portrays the law as a grave abuse that deprives millions of Filipinos of their suffrage rights

CENTER

Reports Comelec’s perspective, emphasizing the operational, legal and cost implications of the election postponement

The left emphasises

  • described the measure as a "grave abuse of discretion"
  • strips millions of Filipinos of their suffrage rights
  • strategically passed just before the candidate-filing deadline

In this story

barangay electionssangguniang kabataanelection postponementSupreme Court reviewRomulo MacalintalRepublic Act No. 12326voter disenfranchisementterm extension
Get the beta ↗