Energy Dept's Coal Plant Extensions Spark Legal Battles Ahead of Midterms
Energy Secretary Chris Wright ordered several aging coal plants to stay online, prompting lawsuits that have reached a federal appeals court just before the midterm election.
In late 2025 the Energy Department, led by Secretary Chris Wright, used a little-used emergency clause to force several coal-fired generators—Craig Unit 1 in Colorado, Consumers Energy’s J.H. Campbell in Michigan and two Indiana plants—to remain in service beyond their planned shutdown dates, renewing the orders multiple times, most recently extending Craig through Christmas Day. Utilities and co-owners, including Tri-State Generation and Transmission and Platte River Power Authority, have sued, arguing the orders violate the Constitution and federal law; a D.C. Circuit panel has already struck down the Michigan orders as lacking a genuine emergency.
The legal fight has entered the 2026 midterm race, with candidates in Michigan, Colorado and Indiana using the issue to argue over electricity affordability and grid reliability. Analysts note that while voters care most about bill costs, the coal-plant disputes illustrate broader climate-policy conflicts shaping the election. If the administration lets the court’s ruling stand, the remaining orders are likely to be overturned, potentially sparing ratepayers billions in added costs.
Why it matters
The case could determine whether the federal government can force coal plants to stay open, affecting electricity bills and climate policy ahead of elections.
In this story
