Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Health

Environmental groups sue Trump administration over PFAS pesticide trifludimoxazin approval

Three advocacy groups have filed a lawsuit in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the Trump administration’s registration of the PFAS herbicide trifludimoxazin.

The Center for Food Safety, the Center for Biological Diversity, and the Pesticide Action & Agroecology Network North America have lodged a suit in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals against the Trump administration’s registration of trifludimoxazin, a PFAS-based herbicide. They contend that the EPA’s 2026 approval breaches the Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and the Endangered Species Act, noting the chemical’s decades-long persistence and classification as a likely human carcinogen.

EPA documents acknowledge thyroid tumors in rodent studies but stopped short of evaluating cancer risk for farmworkers or consumers of contaminated food and water. The groups warn that spray drift can damage crops and native vegetation far from treated fields, and that the herbicide’s toxicity exceeds that of dicamba. They also criticize the agency’s refusal to perform a cumulative risk assessment for PPO-inhibiting herbicides, despite evidence of liver damage and birth defects in animal studies.

Why it matters

The case could halt the use of a persistent, potentially carcinogenic pesticide on major food crops across the United States.

In this story

trifludimoxazinPFAS pesticideEPA approvalherbicide lawsuitcrop spray driftcancer riskendangered speciesPPO inhibitor
Get the beta ↗