Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Experts debate the ethics of Trump's alleged Air Force One decoy plan

Former FBI and Naval War College officials argued the Trump administration's rumored Air Force One ruse might have been defensible, while a psychiatrist labeled the tactic cowardly.

According to former FBI agent Michael Feinberg, the Trump administration may have had a strategic reason to hide Air Force One in a catering cart and move the president to another plane amid threats linked to the Iran conflict, though the subsequent handling was mishandled. Feinberg said the decision could be defensible if it protected intelligence sources, but faulted the later attempts to downplay the risk. Retired Naval War College professor Tom Nichols warned that the White House would likely have responded with extensive falsehoods if the plan became public.

Psychiatrist Henry Abraham, speaking to one outlet, attributed the president's alleged use of a decoy to narcissistic entitlement and a profound lack of empathy, calling the behavior unethical and cowardly. Anchor Katy Tur noted the president's track record of prioritizing personal safety over others, questioning how such actions would be communicated to the public. The discussion reflects broader concerns about transparency, national-security decision-making, and the psychological profile of the president.

Why it matters

It highlights potential misuse of security resources and raises questions about presidential ethics and transparency.

In this story

Air Force Onedecoynarcissismtransparencypresidential ethicsintelligence sources
Get the beta ↗