Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Five Constitutional Tribunal judges reject claim of a competence dispute over their oath

Five judges of Poland's Constitutional Tribunal, appointed by the Sejm, issued a statement saying the alleged competence clash between the President and the Sejm speaker over their oath is unfounded.

On Friday, five members of the Constitutional Tribunal appointed by the Sejm released a joint declaration challenging the argument that a competence dispute between the President and the Sejm speaker prevents them from hearing cases. The judges—Maciej Berek, Marcin Dziurda, Anna Korwin-Piotrowska, Krystian Markiewicz and Maciej Taborowski—pointed out that each took the constitutional oath exclusively before the President, as documented in notarized acts delivered to the President and shown on television.

They contend that the Sejm speaker does not claim any authority over the oath and that the President’s office misapplies article 86 of the Tribunal law, which only halts proceedings during a competence dispute, not the judges’ admission. Furthermore, they explain that the technical steps required to admit judges are not a distinct legal process. With five of the fifteen judges currently barred from participating, the dispute hampers the quorum needed for the Tribunal to resolve competence issues, which requires at least eleven judges.

Why it matters

The dispute affects the functioning of Poland's highest constitutional court and could delay key legal decisions.

In this story

constitutional tribunaljudges oathcompetence disputePresidentSejm speakerarticle 86legal impassePoland
Get the beta ↗