Former death-row inmate warns livestreamed execution could harm society
Damien Echols, freed after nearly two decades on death row, says broadcasting Nidal Hasan’s firing-squad execution would damage America’s mental and moral fabric.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the firing‑squad execution of Nidal Hasan, the former Army major convicted for the 2009 Fort Hood attack, could be broadcast live in December. The proposal has been condemned by officials in Australia, including cabinet minister Murray Watt and Greens Senator Sarah Hanson‑Young, who called it “absolutely disgusting” and “revolting.” In the United States, President Donald Trump has expressed uncertainty about the plan, weighing arguments that a broadcast could deter copycats or create a martyr, while several Republican leaders such as House Speaker Johnson and Senators Murkowski and Cramer have publicly criticized it as turning a solemn punishment into entertainment. Legal scholar Steve Vladeck has also denounced the Pentagon’s idea, calling it “colossally stupid” and warning it could serve extremist aims.
Why it matters
The debate raises questions about how governments present state‑sanctioned violence and the potential for such broadcasts to fuel extremist propaganda.
How the sides frame it
HIGH AGREEMENTAll camps uniformly condemn the plan to livestream the execution, emphasizing its moral repugnance and potential to inspire extremist recruitment.
LEFT
Left-leaning coverage frames the livestream plan as a grotesque, morally disgusting spectacle that risks turning execution into entertainment and creating a martyr.
CENTER
Center coverage frames the proposal as a dangerous, “disgusting” move that could harm society and serve as a recruitment tool for terrorists.
RIGHT
Right-leaning coverage frames the plan as a widely rebuked, morally repugnant idea that sparks public backlash and raises concerns about dignity and extremist propaganda.
The left emphasises
- described as "disgusting" and "beyond disgusting"
- warns it could turn execution into entertainment and create a martyr
- highlights bipartisan criticism and moral outrage
The right emphasises
- notes public backlash labeling the plan "absurd," "medieval," and an "abomination"
- highlights reservations from Republican leaders and Trump
- frames the livestream as a violation of human dignity and a potential terrorist recruitment tool
How this story developed
- Oct 5 Trump authorizes shooting execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan
- Oct 6 Pentagon announced the execution will be carried out by firing squad.
- Oct 7 Execution date set for Dec 3.
- Oct 8 Pentagon confirmed the execution will be livestreamed.
- Oct 9 The Pentagon will broadcast the execution of Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood gunman, before a firing squad as a public lesson.
- Oct 9 British cabinet minister Bridget Phillipson called the US decision to livestream a firing-squad execution of Nidal Hasan "disturbing" and reiterated Britain’s opposition to capital punishment.
- Oct 9 Survivor Alonzo Lunsford voiced support for the execution method while warning that a livestream could be misused.
- Oct 9 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth disclosed that the execution will be carried out by firing squad and streamed online.
- Oct 9 Acting Army Secretary Adam Telle confirmed the execution date and firing‑squad method.
- Oct 11 President Trump said the decision on whether to livestream the execution remains pending.
- Oct 13 President Trump has signaled hesitation over proceeding with the livestream.
- Oct 13 Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said the livestream would not increase security risk.
In this story
Related stories
16 in this thread