Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Former Delhi HC Justice warns that executive magistrate powers threaten civil liberties

Former Delhi High Court Justice S Muralidhar criticised the use of executive magistrate powers to extend custody of Cockroach Janta Party activists detained for a symbolic flag protest.

On October 13, Delhi Police detained Cockroach Janta Party co-convenors Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das for a flag protest at Jantar Mantar, then placed them in Tihar Jail after an executive magistrate ordered them to sign peace bonds. The magistrate later extended their judicial custody for two additional days, despite a 2018 ruling by Justice S Muralidhar that such extensions cannot exceed seven days without a first one outlet's report.

Muralidhar told Scroll that the executive magistrate combines the roles of complainant, judge and executioner, violating constitutional safeguards. He urged the Delhi High Court, set to hear the case, to invalidate Section 126 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, which he says perpetuates colonial-era preventive arrest powers. The incident reflects a pattern of misuse of executive magistrate authority nationwide, raising questions about the balance between security and fundamental freedoms.

Why it matters

It exposes how preventive arrest powers can be used to curb dissent, challenging constitutional rights in India.

In this story

preventive arrestexecutive magistratepeace bondcivil libertiesBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha SanhitaDelhi High Courtprotestcolonial law
Get the beta ↗