Former Lab Technician Weighs Whether to Return Critical Calibration Records
A 61-year-old ex-QA lab worker, dismissed after using a left-handed shortcut, wonders if he should hand over calibration standards and a notebook that were inadvertently packed with his personal items.
After three and a half decades in a QA laboratory, the writer was let go following a corporate merger that replaced his supervisor with someone lacking lab experience. To accommodate his left-handedness, he recorded results on paper and entered them later, a method the new manager labeled a procedural violation. The dismissal was officially for insubordination.
During the exit process, staff inadvertently included a box of calibration standards and a notebook documenting quarterly equipment checks in his personal belongings. These items are essential for maintaining product quality and could trigger costly recalls or failed customer audits if missing. The columnist advises returning the materials with a brief note, avoiding further conflict while preserving the writer’s future options. He also suggests that, if the company later seeks his expertise, he could negotiate a high consulting fee.
Why it matters
Returning the calibration data prevents potential product quality issues and protects the former employee from legal or reputational trouble.
In this story
