Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Business
UNDERREPORTED

Google engineer's insider-trading case sparks debate over prediction-market regulation

Michele Spagnuolo, a Google engineer charged with insider trading on Polymarket, has filed a motion to dismiss the accusations, arguing the bets were gambling, not regulated swaps.

Michele Spagnuolo, a Google engineer arrested earlier this year, has asked a court to throw out federal charges of commodities fraud, wire fraud and money laundering tied to his activity on the Polymarket platform. Prosecutors say he, under the pseudonym “AlphaRaccoon,” made a series of bets that netted over $1.2 million, including a correct prediction about a singer’s search popularity. Spagnuolo’s counsel argues the wagers are classic gambling, not financial instruments subject to the Commodity Exchange Act, and that U.S. authorities lack jurisdiction because he is a non-U.S. citizen who placed the bets from Zurich on a platform administered by a Panama-based entity.

The defense further asserts that the alleged insider information held no commercial value for Google. This dispute mirrors a nationwide battle between state attorneys general and regulators over the legal status of prediction markets, a conflict that could eventually reach the Supreme Court. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not commented, and Google declined to respond.

Why it matters

The case could shape how U.S. law treats prediction-market betting and affect future insider-trading prosecutions.

In this story

prediction marketscommodities fraudwire fraudmoney launderingjurisdictionSupreme CourtgamblingCommodity Exchange Act
Get the beta ↗