Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics
UNDERREPORTED

Government reviews secret aged-care funding algorithm as waitlists swell and deaths rise

The health minister confirmed a review of the undisclosed aged-care funding algorithm, which critics say differs from the Royal Commission-backed questionnaire and is linked to growing waitlists and fatalities.

At a press briefing, Health Minister Mark Butler said the government is reviewing the secret formula used to allocate aged-care funding, clarifying that it is separate from the Independent Assessment Tool (IAT) endorsed by the Royal Commission. Unlike the IAT, which was trialled on 22,000 people with clinician input, the algorithm was launched on November 1 without a live pilot and with no publicly disclosed development report.

Professor Kathy Eagar, who designed a comparable classification system, reverse-engineered the Support at Home algorithm and found that minor score changes can alter annual funding by nearly $40,000, while many clinical factors are ignored. Senate estimates revealed the algorithm was built by a consultancy, then modified in-house, using data from 200,000 assessments but without clinician sign-off. The Senate has voted to abandon the tool, the Ombudsman is investigating 800 complaints, and the government has earmarked $18 million to review both the IAT and the algorithm. Critics argue the lack of an override mechanism and a cumbersome appeals process leave many seniors without recourse as waitlists grow and deaths increase.

Why it matters

A flawed funding formula threatens the care and lives of vulnerable seniors across the country.

In this story

aged care algorithmfunding formulaSenate reviewOmbudsman investigationwaitlistssenior deathsalgorithm flawsgovernment reviewKathy Eagar
Get the beta ↗