Hillsborough Law bill passes Lords committee despite emergency services concerns
The Public Office (Accountability) Bill cleared its committee stage in the House of Lords, while peers warned it omits emergency responders such as paramedics.
The Public Office (Accountability) Bill, dubbed the Hillsborough Law, successfully completed its committee stage in the House of Lords, establishing a statutory duty of candour for public authorities during investigations. During debate, Baroness Levitt warned that the proposed offence of seriously improper conduct fails to apply to paramedics, referencing a prosecution where a paramedic's misconduct could not be upheld because the role was not deemed a public office.
She stressed that this gap could allow serious abuse of vulnerable patients to go unpunished. Lord Lemos, the justice minister, replied that a Law Commission review recommended keeping frontline healthcare staff outside the bill’s scope unless they work in state detention, citing the mixed public-private nature of health services. He cautioned that extending the bill to include such workers would create arbitrary distinctions and add complexity. The legislation will now be examined at the report stage in the Lords, with amendments voted on before it returns to the Commons for final approval.
Why it matters
The bill could leave emergency responders outside new accountability rules, affecting public trust and patient safety.
How the sides frame it
LOW AGREEMENTLeft-leaning coverage stresses emergency-services worries that the bill excludes paramedics and could let abuse of vulnerable patients go unpunished, while right-leaning coverage warns the bill may undermine transparency, free speech and create chilling prosecutions.
LEFT
Highlights emergency-services concerns about paramedic exclusions and patient-safety gaps
RIGHT
Argues the legislation could curb openness, free speech and invite politically motivated prosecutions
The left emphasises
- the proposed offence of seriously improper conduct fails to apply to paramedics
- this gap could allow serious abuse of vulnerable patients to go unpunished
The right emphasises
- the vague “misleading” offence could inundate the Director of Public Prosecutions with politically motivated prosecutions
- it could chill democratic discourse and curb transparency
In this story
