Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Crime & Justice

Holdout juror claims fellow jurors pushed not-guilty stance from start

Michael P. Desronvil, the lone holdout in the Lindsay Clancy trial, said most jurors acted like activists seeking a not-guilty verdict from day one.

After the mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, holdout juror Michael P. Desronvil explained his doubts about fellow jurors’ motives, describing them as “activists” who wanted an acquittal from the outset. He reported that eight jurors favored a not-guilty verdict, two supported a guilty verdict, and two remained undecided throughout the week-long deliberations. Desronvil asserted that his own guilty conclusion relied strictly on the evidence presented in court and that Clancy was fully aware of her actions.

Judge William Sullivan ended the trial after the nine-woman, three-man jury spent over 38 hours without reaching unanimity. The case will resume with a hearing set for September 29. Desronvil’s comments were given in an interview with Ray Marcel of Fugitive TV shortly after the trial concluded on September 4.

Why it matters

The juror’s testimony reveals internal divisions that led to a mistrial, affecting the future of the high-profile case.

How this story developed

  1. Aug 31 Support for Lindsay Clancy Sparks Debate Over Women’s Suffrage Legacy
  2. Sep 13 Women’s groups have staged protests outside the Massachusetts courthouse as the trial continues.

In this story

holdout jurormistrialjuror activismnot guiltyguilty verdictcourt evidencedeliberationsLindsay Clancy trialJudge William Sullivan
Get the beta ↗