Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Business

Judge Allows DOJ and States to Pursue Abbott MitraClip Kickback Lawsuit

A federal judge ruled that the lawsuit accusing Abbott Laboratories of providing illicit incentives to doctors for using its MitraClip device can proceed to trial.

In San Diego, Judge Todd Robinson, a Trump-appointed federal jurist, ruled that the litigation accusing Abbott Laboratories of kickbacks tied to its MitraClip heart-valve device will continue toward a jury trial. The action, initiated by the Department of Justice and more than two dozen state governments, claims Abbott provided doctors with cash, lavish meals and patient referrals to boost use of the patented device, breaching the Anti-Kickback Statute and the False Claims Act.

Robinson distinguished modest meals at legitimate training events from extravagant dinners at upscale hotels, allowing those latter claims to proceed. He also rejected Abbott's attempts to exclude expert testimony from policy analyst Genevieve Kanter and cardiac surgeon John Karamichalis, finding both witnesses credible. However, the court granted Abbott summary judgment on allegations specific to Florida and California, citing a lack of concrete evidence of false Medicaid claims. The broader case, concerning thousands of alleged improper Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, remains slated for trial.

Why it matters

The decision keeps a major antitrust and fraud case against a leading medical device maker alive, affecting healthcare costs and compliance.

In this story

MitraClipkickbacksanti-kickback statutefalse claims actmedical devicefederal lawsuitexpert testimony
Get the beta ↗