Judge dismisses mass-tort suit over everyday packaged foods
U.S. District Judge Mia Roberts Perez threw out a Pennsylvania lawsuit by Morgan and Morgan that alleged shelf-stable foods caused health problems, calling the complaint deficient.
A mass-tort action brought by Morgan and Morgan in Pennsylvania claimed that shelf-stable and prepared foods caused specific health issues, aiming to hold a wide category of everyday products liable. U.S. District Judge Mia Roberts Perez ruled the complaint "woefully deficient," dismissing it first in August 2025 and again nearly a year later after a revised filing. She emphasized that the suit relied on speculation rather than proven causation, and that such lawsuits threaten consumer autonomy and could drive up food prices if companies are forced to settle.
The judge's decision underscores the view that policy and standards should be set by legislators and regulators, not by litigants seeking large payouts. Critics argue that the mass-tort system incentivizes firms to chase new targets for profit, turning affordable foods into legal battlegrounds.
Why it matters
The ruling stops a potentially costly lawsuit that could have raised food prices and limited consumer choice.
In this story
