Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Judge links pandemic meal waivers to vulnerabilities cited in Feeding Our Future case

A magistrate judge found that COVID-era waivers in the child nutrition program created opportunities for fraud, a point highlighted in the appeal of Feeding Our Future founder Aimee Bock.

In an appellate filing, Aimee Bock attached findings from U.S. Magistrate Judge David Schultz that pandemic-era USDA waivers made the child nutrition program vulnerable to fraud. The waivers, part of the Maintaining Essential Access to Lunch for Students Act and incorporated into the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, relaxed enrollment and verification rules. Bock, founder of the Minneapolis nonprofit Feeding Our Future, was convicted for running a network of fake food distributors that kept a 10%-15% administrative fee, siphoning over $240 million from federal funds.

The judge’s assessment draws on FBI affidavits and statements from co-conspirators, noting that the waivers allowed for-profit restaurants and off-site distribution. While the waivers are linked to the fraud’s scope, the judge did not attribute the scheme directly to Rep. Ilhan Omar’s legislation. Bock is now seeking to overturn her convictions or reduce her sentence before the 8th Circuit.

Why it matters

The case highlights how emergency policy changes can create loopholes exploited for large-scale fraud.

In this story

child nutrition programCOVID-era waiversfraud vulnerabilityFeeding Our Futurefederal reimbursementslegislative waiversappeal filing
Get the beta ↗