Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Crime & Justice

Justice Department appeals contempt sanction against federal lawyer in ICE release case

The Justice Department asked the Eighth Circuit to overturn a contempt order that penalized a government attorney after ICE released a detainee contrary to a court directive.

The Justice Department has filed a brief with the Eighth Circuit urging reversal of a district court contempt order that targeted Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Isihara after Immigration and Customs Enforcement failed to follow a release order for detainee Rigoberto Soto Jimenez. The order, imposed by Judge Laura Provinzino, required ICE to release Jimenez in Minnesota and return his belongings, but ICE instead moved him to Texas and initially withheld his property.

Although ICE later retrieved the property, preventing any fine from accruing, the department argues that penalizing an attorney for a client’s actions is an improper coercive tactic. Justice Department attorney Daniel Tenny emphasized the need for a clear court directive specifying the attorney’s obligations at the time of the contempt filing. The appellate panel, including Judges Bobby Shepherd, James Loken and Steven Colloton, questioned the standing and specificity of the contempt order, while amicus counsel Jeffrey Justman argued the attorney’s failure to forward the order justified the sanction. The case highlights tensions over attorney accountability during the surge of immigration-related habeas petitions.

Why it matters

It could reshape how courts hold government lawyers accountable for agency actions.

How the sides frame it

HIGH AGREEMENT

Both camps report the Justice Department’s appeal of a contempt order against attorney Matthew Isihara and stress that penalizing an attorney for a client’s actions is improper, with only minor wording differences.

LEFT

Left-leaning coverage frames the story as the Justice Department fighting a judge’s contempt order and highlights the impropriety of using contempt to pressure an attorney’s client.

CENTER

Center coverage frames the story as the Justice Department appealing the contempt sanction and stresses the need for a clear court directive on the attorney’s obligations.

The left emphasises

  • fights judge's contempt order
  • claims penalizing an attorney for a client’s conduct is improper
  • warns using contempt to pressure an attorney’s client is improper

In this story

contempt orderhabeas petitionICE complianceattorney liabilitycivil contempt finefederal litigationimmigration enforcement
Get the beta ↗