Justice Department memo seeks to expand presidential privilege for private advisers
A new Office of Legal Counsel memorandum argues that a president's private aides can claim executive privilege to block congressional subpoenas, potentially shielding them from testimony.
The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel released a legal opinion that private presidential advisers may invoke executive privilege to refuse congressional subpoenas, treating them as extensions of the president with absolute immunity. The memo builds on the 2019 Don McGahn dispute, where the Trump White House used “testimonial immunity” to block his testimony in the Mueller investigation, a claim later overturned by a district court and settled after appeals.
Historical examples such as Bill Clinton’s failed privilege attempts, Nixon’s rejected tape claim, and early cases involving Thomas Jefferson are cited, though the memo is criticized for misreading those rulings. Legal experts argue the stance threatens congressional oversight and could foster presidential misconduct. The document’s timing suggests preparation for upcoming congressional investigations, raising concerns about the impartiality of OLC analyses. Scholars call for courts to disregard such opinions and for the legal profession to reject outcome-driven reasoning.
Why it matters
If adopted, the memo could let presidents shield private aides from testimony, weakening congressional oversight.
In this story
