Justice Department seeks to revive indictments against Comey and Letitia James
The Justice Department is appealing a ruling that District Attorney Lindsey Halligan was improperly appointed, aiming to restore criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The Justice Department announced an appeal to reinstate criminal cases filed against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after a court ruled that District Attorney Lindsey Halligan’s appointment was unlawful because she had not been. DOJ officials contend that the illegality of Halligan’s appointment does not invalidate the indictments. Following Halligan’s resignation, a panel in the Eastern District of Virginia unanimously selected Erik Siebert as interim prosecutor.
The upcoming oral arguments will be before an undisclosed three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit, a court known for not pre-announcing its judges, creating a “crapshoot” for the parties. Former Virginia Solicitor General Michelle Kallen advised attorneys to prepare for probing questions about the statutory language, its legislative purpose, and the broader implications of congressional involvement in U.S. attorney appointments. Earlier, magistrate judges in Alexandria criticized the use of Halligan’s name on filing documents, deeming it unacceptable.
Why it matters
The outcome could determine if indictments survive when filed by a prosecutor later deemed improperly appointed.
How the sides frame it
MODERATE AGREEMENTLeft-leaning coverage emphasizes the legal mechanics of the DOJ appeal and the uncertainty of the Fourth Circuit panel, while centrist coverage frames the case as a Trump-related effort to revive indictments against his critics, and right-leaning coverage stresses the administration’s unilateral appointments and the broader implications for executive power.
LEFT
Focuses on the DOJ’s appeal to reinstate the cases and the legal uncertainty surrounding the Fourth Circuit panel.
CENTER
Portrays the appeal as a Trump-driven attempt to revive indictments against political opponents, highlighting the improper appointment issue.
RIGHT
Highlights the unilateral nature of the attorney appointments, the appellate challenge, and potential impact on the administration’s ability to name prosecutors.
The left emphasises
- appeal to reinstate criminal cases filed against Comey and James
- DOJ officials say the illegality of Halligan’s appointment does not invalidate the indictments
- court known for not pre-announcing its judges, creating a “crapshoot” for the parties
The right emphasises
- unilateral U.S. attorney appointments face appellate challenge
- White House has asked the Supreme Court to hear a related dispute
- outcome could affect the administration’s ability to name federal prosecutors unilaterally
How this story developed
- Sep 10 Top DOJ prosecutor Joe DiGenova quits amid high-profile conspiracy probe
- Sep 11 DiGenova submitted his resignation on Thursday.
In this story
Related stories
3 in this thread