Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Karnataka High Court dismisses FIR against men for criticizing Supreme Court ruling

The Karnataka High Court quashed a police FIR against 13 men who posted posters calling a Supreme Court judgment a denial of justice, finding the slogans did not constitute hate or religious offense.

In an order dated October 15, 2026, the Karnataka High Court set aside a police FIR filed against 13 individuals for affixing posters in Mangaluru that described a recent Supreme Court judgment as a denial of justice and called for public action. The complaint invoked IPC sections 153A (promoting enmity), 295A (outraging religious feelings), 120B (conspiracy) and a state disfigurement provision. Justice H P Sandesh examined whether the language met the statutory elements and concluded that the expressions represented dissent, not hate, noting that the impact on a reasonable majority must be considered.

Relying on Article 19 of the Constitution and Supreme Court rulings such as Javed Ahmad Hajam and Bilal Ahmed Kaloo, the bench held the slogans did not constitute the alleged offences. Accordingly, the court exercised its power under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash the FIR, clearing the accused of all charges.

Why it matters

It clarifies the limits of criminal liability for criticizing court decisions, reinforcing free-speech protections in India.

In this story

free speechSupreme Court judgmentKarnataka High CourtFIR quashedIPC sections 153A 295AArticle 19public dissentSection 482 CrPC
Get the beta ↗