Karnataka High Court orders police to curb FIRs over social media criticism
The Karnataka High Court instructed police to stop automatically filing FIRs for social-media posts, emphasizing that criticism is protected speech.
In an order dated October 16, Justice M Nagaprasanna of the Karnataka High Court set out rules to prevent the mechanical registration of FIRs based solely on social-media content. The court highlighted that criticism and protest are protected under Article 19(1)(a) and should be judged by reasonable, strong-minded people, not by those who view every dissent as a threat. Police are now mandated to examine whether a complaint, on its face, discloses the essential ingredients of an offence before filing a FIR and to check for existing cases on the same incident.
The guidelines also require a preliminary inquiry under Section 173(3) of the BNSS where legally permissible and a careful review of intent under provisions like Section 353(2) that penalise false information intended to promote enmity. These directives were issued while the court dismissed a criminal case against Sandeep Kumar, who had reposted a report about six men threatening a woman with a knife. The Karnataka director general and inspector general of police must circulate the guidelines and ensure they are followed.
Why it matters
It limits police overreach on online speech, safeguarding freedom of expression in India.
In this story
