Lawsuit Targets Federal Database Used to Intimidate Naturalized Voters
The UCLA Voting Rights Project and immigrant-rights group CHIRLA have filed a lawsuit alleging that the federal SAVE database is being used to intimidate naturalized citizens and jeopardize mail-in ballots.
The UCLA Voting Rights Project, joined by the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), has sued the federal government over the use of the SAVE database, arguing it intimidates naturalized citizens and threatens the integrity of mail-in voting. The complaint cites the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Administrative Procedure Act, asserting that the program’s bulk matching of immigration and Social Security data violates federal rules and privacy protections.
Critics say the Trump administration’s broader strategy—denaturalization filings, threats of arrests for illegal registration, and pressure on states to turn over voter rolls—aims to suppress Democratic-leaning constituencies, particularly immigrant voters who comprise about one-tenth of the electorate. A recent case in California, where a Honduran green-card holder was charged with felonies for allegedly registering to vote, underscores the aggressive enforcement approach. If successful, the lawsuit could curb the use of SAVE for voter-roll checks and limit the administration’s ability to “screen” mail-in ballots this November.
Why it matters
The case could stop a federal data system from being used to deter eligible naturalized voters and affect upcoming elections.
How this story developed
- Aug 22 Supreme Court Halts Lower Court Block on Trump Mail-Voting Order Amid Implementation Hurdles
- Aug 29 U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied Trump’s third request to transfer the New York hush‑money case to federal court.
- Aug 29 Utah senators and a representative publicly praised the Supreme Court’s ruling and defended the state’s mail‑in voting system.
- Aug 29 A Maryland federal judge issued a preliminary injunction stopping President Donald Trump's latest executive order aimed at limiting birthright citizenship.
- Aug 30 A climate researcher introduced a Supreme Court‑expansion litmus test for Senate Democrats.
- Aug 31 The Supreme Court issued a 6‑3 stay overturning the district‑court injunction.
- Aug 31 David Steiner, the new Postmaster General, said the USPS will obey the court decision that ultimately prevails on the voting rule.
- Aug 31 Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine told Senator Elissa Slotkin that the U.S. military will not send active-duty forces or federalized National Guard members to polling places for the November 2026 midterm elections.
- Aug 31 Judge Indira Talwani denied a request to suspend the 14‑day temporary restraining order and set an expedited hearing on a preliminary injunction.
- Sep 1 Senator Slotkin formally requested a written response from the Pentagon about possible troop deployment to polling sites.
- Sep 1 A whistleblower disclosed that the Postal Service is proceeding with the verification portal despite the district court’s injunction.
- Sep 1 Jim Clyburn publicly advocated expanding the Supreme Court to 13 justices.
- Sep 2 Speaker Mike Johnson announced a House vote on a constitutional amendment to limit the Supreme Court to nine justices.
- Sep 3 A federal judge granted a preliminary injunction halting enforcement of the order.
In this story
Related stories
14 in this thread