Locke's Homesteading Theory Used to Argue Israel's Historical Land Rights
An opinion column argues that John Locke’s principle of first occupation supports Israel’s claim to contested territories, citing millennia-long Jewish presence.
In a recent opinion piece, the writer invokes John Locke’s homesteading doctrine—ownership belongs to the first laborer on unclaimed land—to bolster Israel’s claim over disputed areas. Citing a Jewish presence of roughly 3,500 years versus Arab settlement of at most three centuries, the author argues that the original Jewish homesteaders retain title unless they abandon the land. Archaeological findings are highlighted, showing Jewish layers beneath later Arab material, reinforcing the notion of continuous ownership.
Critics who note Locke’s focus on individuals are addressed, with the author pointing out that legal entities such as tribes, corporations, and nations can hold property collectively. The column ultimately labels current Arab occupants as trespassers and suggests that Israel’s claim to Gaza, the Golan Heights, and broader territories is justified under this framework.
Why it matters
The essay frames a philosophical justification for Israel's territorial claims, influencing public debate on the conflict.
In this story
