Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Politics

Madras High Court orders disclosure of look-out circulars to affected individuals

The Madras High Court ruled that anyone subject to a look-out circular must be informed of its existence, allowing them to respond or contest it.

In a hearing at the Madras High Court, Justice V Lakshminarayanan stated that the Constitution guarantees an accused the right to be informed of any proceedings against them, and that India does not practice secretive trials. The comment followed a petition by K Padmanabhan, who claimed ignorance of several look-out circulars and red flags filed in his name. The Bureau of Immigration argued that LOCs are confidential documents, a position also supported by the CBI.

The court ordered both agencies to submit an affidavit detailing why LOCs are treated as confidential and how a person can secure permission to travel abroad before a final report is filed. The matter was adjourned to September 16 for further consideration.

Why it matters

It reinforces due-process rights by requiring authorities to inform individuals of travel restrictions placed on them.

In this story

look-out circularconstitutional rightstravel restrictionaffidavitcourt rulingconfidentialitylegal procedure
Get the beta ↗