Mark Galeotti warns that good intentions can fuel techno-authoritarian crime networks
In a video interview, crime scholar Mark Galeotti argues that organized crime has evolved with state power and new technologies, warning that well-meaning security measures may enable techno-authoritarianism.
Mark Galeotti, an honorary professor at UCL and former director of the European Security Centre, explores the deep ties between organized crime and state formation in a recent interview. Drawing on historical examples from ancient Rome to Renaissance Italy and the Netherlands, he shows how criminal networks have always shadowed emerging political and economic systems. Today, he estimates the global illicit market at roughly $2 trillion, with drug trafficking accounting for 40-60 % of that sum, while noting the diversification of criminal enterprises into money-laundering, cybercrime and high-tech smuggling.
Galeotti warns that law-enforcement struggles to keep pace with rapid technological change, and that societies risk embracing pervasive surveillance—exemplified by practices in Russia and post-9/11 United States—that could evolve into techno-authoritarian regimes. He stresses that the gap between state authority and civil society creates fertile ground for organized crime, and that the allure of cheap goods and convenience often blinds the public to the environmental and social harms financed by illicit activities.
Why it matters
Understanding how crime adapts to technology helps citizens assess the trade-offs of security measures and privacy.
In this story
