Neutrogena's delayed Instagram apology sparks criticism from PR experts
Neutrogena posted an Instagram apology for how it treated former ambassador Hayden Panettiere, but PR specialists say the response was too late and insufficient.
Neutrogena responded on Instagram, admitting that Hayden Panettiere felt unsupported during a difficult period, after fans reacted to a podcast clip in which she said the company ended their partnership in 2015 after she spoke about postpartum depression. PR professionals criticized the timing, the limited admission of fault, and the decision to disable comments, interpreting it as a dismissal of public dialogue. The statement also mentioned a forthcoming significant investment with a long-standing community health partner to improve access to postpartum support, but no specifics have been released.
Commentators suggested the brand should increase transparency and reconsider moral clauses in ambassador contracts. Comparisons were drawn to Nike's policy changes after criticism over its treatment of pregnant athletes, implying Neutrogena faces a similar crossroads. The controversy coincides with other marketing missteps, such as criticism of current ambassador Tate McRae's TikTok post, which the company addressed with a self-referential video featuring its makeup remover wipes.
Why it matters
The mishandled apology highlights how consumer brands risk reputational damage when they fail to address sensitive health-related concerns promptly.
In this story
