Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Sport

NIL deals mark the latest chapter in a long, uneven saga of college athlete pay

The article traces how paying college athletes has evolved from early cash perks to today’s name, image and likeness deals, highlighting key legal milestones.

Since the NCAA’s inception in 1906, college athletes have received various forms of compensation, from travel vouchers to tuition coverage, often without formal oversight. The 1948 Sanity Code sought to limit recruiting gifts, but the practice continued, prompting the NCAA to standardize scholarships in 1956. The turning point arrived with Ed O'Bannon’s 2014 class-action suit, which challenged the use of athletes’ likenesses and paved the way for cost-of-living stipends.

Subsequent settlements have permitted schools to allocate up to $21.3 million in revenue to players and legitimize third-party NIL agreements, inflating some football payrolls to $50 million. Lawmakers are now considering a Senate bill that would raise the NIL salary cap to nearly $49 million per institution, aiming to shift spending from third parties to regulated school budgets. If the bill fails, power conferences such as the SEC and Big Ten may develop their own frameworks, with smaller programs fearing financial strain.

Why it matters

Understanding NIL’s evolution shows how college sports financing and athlete rights are reshaping the industry.

In this story

name image likenesscollege athlete compensationSanity Coderecruiting inducementsrevenue sharingsalary caplegislative bill
Get the beta ↗