Beta The Briev beta is out. Free on iPhone via TestFlight — install it in under a minute.

Join the beta ↗
Briev
Live
Crime & Justice

North Carolina mother plans insanity plea as experts warn of rising similar defenses

Andrea Faust, charged with killing her 3-year-old and attempting to kill her 2-year-old, has filed notice of an insanity and diminished-capacity defense, prompting comparisons to Lindsay Clancy’s case.

In Durham, North Carolina, Andrea Faust, 41, has been charged with murdering her 3-year-old son and attempting to murder her 2-year-old son on February 12. Her counsel, Nicole Galinsky, submitted a notice indicating the defense will rely on claims of not guilty by reason of insanity and diminished capacity, citing an expert who concluded Faust was unable to distinguish right from wrong at the time. The strategy mirrors that of Lindsay Clancy, whose Massachusetts trial highlighted postpartum psychosis as a factor, though Galinsky stresses Faust did not suffer from postpartum psychosis.

Retired Superior Judge Jack Lu warned that the Clancy case may encourage more defendants to raise mental-health defenses, even though such pleas are seldom successful. Faust was previously deemed incompetent to stand trial in March, but a later hospital assessment found her competent as of May 21, and another evaluation will focus on her mental condition during the crimes. The case underscores ongoing debates about how the legal system treats severe mental illness in violent offenses involving children.

Why it matters

The case highlights how courts may handle mental-health defenses in serious child-related crimes.

In this story

insanity defensepostpartum mental healthmurder trialDurhammental illnesslegal strategycourt competency
Get the beta ↗